Re: [PATCH] mutex: Introduce mutex_cpu_relax()

From: Gerald Schaefer
Date: Thu Oct 14 2010 - 13:31:17 EST


On Do, 2010-10-14 at 17:59 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 17:33 +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
>
> > --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ config S390
> > select HAVE_KERNEL_BZIP2
> > select HAVE_KERNEL_LZMA
> > select HAVE_KERNEL_LZO
> > + select HAVE_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
> > select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK
> > select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK_BH
> > select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK
>
> >
> > +#ifndef HAVE_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
> > +#define mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
> > +#endif
>
> Won't KConfig make CONFIG_HAVE_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX from that?
>
> Also, don't you have to first create a dummy Kconfig variable before you
> select it?

Of course you're right. I first used a #define in a header file,
but decided to rather use the Kconfig approach to avoid header
file dependency problems, should have been more careful with that.

I'll send a new patch.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/