Re: [PATCH 0/4] memblock related fixes for -tip

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Wed Oct 13 2010 - 19:15:04 EST


On 10/13/2010 03:06 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 10/13/2010 01:03 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> a) Add an explicit interface to allocate bottoms-up, and have Xen use it
>>> because it needs it. This is appropriate if (and only if) the
>>> allocations in Xen aren't underneath a bunch of extra layers.
>> The allocation is done in find_early_table_space() in x86/mm/init.c, so
>> the allocation call itself can't be easily replaced, but I suppose some
>> of the parameters could be global and tweaked by Xen code, but that's
>> pretty ugly.
> we already have
> base = memblock_find_in_range(start, max_pfn_mapped<<PAGE_SHIFT,
> tables, PAGE_SIZE);
>
> so looks like xen have set max_pfn_mapped wrong?

The Xen code is setting the max_pfn_mapped correctly, but it is just
being overridden by:

max_pfn_mapped = KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;

in setup_arch() - and KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE is hard-coded to 512MB...

How is this correct? Does kernel/head_64.S map everything up to 512MB
or something?

J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/