Re: [PATCH 1/5] secmark: do not return early if there was no error

[Paul Moore]

On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:40 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> Commit 4a5a5c73 attempted to pass decent error messages back to userspace for
> netfilter errors.  In xt_SECMARK.c however the patch screwed up and returned
> on 0 (aka no error) early and didn't finish setting up secmark.  This results
> in a kernel BUG if you use SECMARK.

...

> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>

> ---
> 
>  net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
> index 23b2d6c..364ad16 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int secmark_tg_check(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
>  	switch (info->mode) {
>  	case SECMARK_MODE_SEL:
>  		err = checkentry_selinux(info);
> -		if (err <= 0)
> +		if (err)
>  			return err;
>  		break;
>  
> 

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/