Re: [PATCH -v3 3/6] x86, NMI, Rewrite NMI handler

[Huang Ying]

On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 00:13 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 14:49 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > notify_die(DIE_NMI_IPI);
> > notify_die(DIE_NMI);
> > /* process io port 0x61 */
> > nmi_watchdog_touch();
> > unknown_nmi(); 
> 
> Why keep NMI_IPI? What the heck is it for?

DIE_NMI_IPI is used for CPU-specific or CPU-local NMIs, such as perf
NMI. While DIE_NMI is used for non-CPU-specific or global NMIs, such as
NMI notification from source bridge.

The order between these two is important. So we use two die value to
enforce the order.

> I'd like to see:
> 
>  DIE_NMI
>  DIE_NMI_UNKNOWN
> 
> In DIE_NMI we walk the chain and deal with NMIs, in DIE_NMI_UNKNOWN we
> try to consume extra NMIs where possible (like the much discussed extra
> PMU interrupts).

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/