Re: stable cc's in linux -next was Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem brokenon SGI UV

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:21:20AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Not that I'm trying to say, "it could be worse", just that, "what could
> > be done better?"
> 
> I really don't know. I suspect that a certain amount of problems are
> always going to be inevitable. It's not like you can avoid regressions
> entirely, at least not unless you take the "it's dead, Jim" approach
> to stable.

Yeah, I do feel I keep some of the stable trees around longer then I
should, I've been working to keep that from happening any more in the
future.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/