Re: [RFC PATCH] Bug during kexec...not all cpus are stopped

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Mon Oct 11 2010 - 14:07:30 EST


Alok Kataria <akataria@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Copying a few more maintainers on the thread...
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:34 -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
>> Before starting the new kernel kexec calls machine_shutdown to stop all
>> the cpus, which internally calls native_smp_send_stop. AFAIU, kexec
>> expects that all the cpus are now halted after that call returns.
>> Now, looking at the code for native_smp_send_stop, it assumes that all
>> the processors have processed the REBOOT ipi in 1 second after the IPI
>> was sent.
>> native_smp_send_stop()
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> apic->send_IPI_allbutself(REBOOT_VECTOR);
>>
>> /* Don't wait longer than a second */
>> wait = USEC_PER_SEC;
>> while (num_online_cpus() > 1 && wait--)
>> udelay(1);
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> It just returns after that 1 second irrespective of whether all cpus
>> were halted or not. This brings up a issue in the kexec case, since we
>> can have the BSP starting the new kernel and AP's still processing the
>> REBOOT IPI simultaneously.
>>
>> Many distribution kernels use kexec to load the newly installed kernel
>> during the installation phase, in virtualized environment with the host
>> heavily overcommitted, we have seen some instances when vcpu fails to
>> process the IPI in the allotted 1 sec and as a result the AP's end up
>> accessing uninitialized state (the BSP has already gone ahead with
>> setting up the new state) and causing GPF's.
>>
>> IMO, kexec expects machine_shutdown to return only after all cpus are
>> stopped.
>>
>> The patch below should fix the issue, comments ??
>>
>> --
>> machine_shutdown now takes a parameter "wait", if it is true, it waits
>> until all the cpus are halted. All the callers except kexec still
>> fallback to the earlier version of the shutdown call, where it just
>> waited for max 1 sec before returning.

The approach seems reasonable. However on every path except for the
panic path I would wait for all of the cpus to stop, as that is what
those code paths are expecting. Until last year smp_send_stop always
waited until all of the cpus stopped. So I think changing
machine_shutdown should not need to happen.

This patch cannot be used as is because it changes the parameters to
smp_send_stop() and there are more than just x86 implementations out
there.

Let me propose a slightly different tactic. We need to separate
the panic path from the normal path to avoid confusion. At the
generic level smp_send_stop is exclusively used for the panic
path. So we should keep that, and rename the x86 non-panic path
function something else.

Can you rename the x86 smp_send_stop function say stop_all_other_cpus().

At which point we could implement smp_send_stop as:
stop_all_other_cpus(0);

And everywhere else would call stop_all_other_cpus(1) waiting for
the cpus to actually stop.

I really think we want to wait for the cpus to stop in all cases except
for panic/kdump where we expect things to be broken and we are doing
our best to make things work anyway.

Eric

>> Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h 2010-03-26 16:57:18.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h 2010-10-07 16:41:58.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ struct machine_ops {
>> void (*restart)(char *cmd);
>> void (*halt)(void);
>> void (*power_off)(void);
>> - void (*shutdown)(void);
>> + void (*shutdown)(int wait);
>> void (*crash_shutdown)(struct pt_regs *);
>> void (*emergency_restart)(void);
>> };
>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct machine_ops {
>> extern struct machine_ops machine_ops;
>>
>> void native_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> -void native_machine_shutdown(void);
>> +void native_machine_shutdown(int wait);
>> void machine_real_restart(const unsigned char *code, int length);
>>
>> typedef void (*nmi_shootdown_cb)(int, struct die_args*);
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h 2010-08-03 12:43:47.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h 2010-10-07 16:37:41.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct smp_ops {
>> void (*smp_prepare_cpus)(unsigned max_cpus);
>> void (*smp_cpus_done)(unsigned max_cpus);
>>
>> - void (*smp_send_stop)(void);
>> + void (*smp_send_stop)(int wait);
>> void (*smp_send_reschedule)(int cpu);
>>
>> int (*cpu_up)(unsigned cpu);
>> @@ -71,9 +71,9 @@ extern void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
>> #endif
>> extern struct smp_ops smp_ops;
>>
>> -static inline void smp_send_stop(void)
>> +static inline void smp_send_stop(int wait)
>> {
>> - smp_ops.smp_send_stop();
>> + smp_ops.smp_send_stop(wait);
>> }
>>
>> static inline void smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c 2010-08-03 12:43:47.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c 2010-10-07 16:43:28.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -174,10 +174,10 @@ static void kvm_crash_shutdown(struct pt
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> -static void kvm_shutdown(void)
>> +static void kvm_shutdown(int wait)
>> {
>> native_write_msr(msr_kvm_system_time, 0, 0);
>> - native_machine_shutdown();
>> + native_machine_shutdown(wait);
>> }
>>
>> void __init kvmclock_init(void)
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c 2010-08-03 12:43:47.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c 2010-10-07 16:45:24.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void native_machine_emergency_res
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -void native_machine_shutdown(void)
>> +void native_machine_shutdown(int wait)
>> {
>> /* Stop the cpus and apics */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ void native_machine_shutdown(void)
>> /* O.K Now that I'm on the appropriate processor,
>> * stop all of the others.
>> */
>> - smp_send_stop();
>> + smp_send_stop(wait);
>> #endif
>>
>> lapic_shutdown();
>> @@ -670,14 +670,14 @@ static void native_machine_restart(char
>> printk("machine restart\n");
>>
>> if (!reboot_force)
>> - machine_shutdown();
>> + machine_shutdown(0);
>> __machine_emergency_restart(0);
>> }
>>
>> static void native_machine_halt(void)
>> {
>> /* stop other cpus and apics */
>> - machine_shutdown();
>> + machine_shutdown(0);
>>
>> tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_HALT);
>>
>> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static void native_machine_power_off(voi
>> {
>> if (pm_power_off) {
>> if (!reboot_force)
>> - machine_shutdown();
>> + machine_shutdown(0);
>> pm_power_off();
>> }
>> /* a fallback in case there is no PM info available */
>> @@ -712,9 +712,9 @@ void machine_power_off(void)
>> machine_ops.power_off();
>> }
>>
>> -void machine_shutdown(void)
>> +void machine_shutdown(int wait)
>> {
>> - machine_ops.shutdown();
>> + machine_ops.shutdown(wait);
>> }
>>
>> void machine_emergency_restart(void)
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c 2010-10-07 16:30:34.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c 2010-10-07 16:34:16.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -159,10 +159,10 @@ asmlinkage void smp_reboot_interrupt(voi
>> irq_exit();
>> }
>>
>> -static void native_smp_send_stop(void)
>> +static void native_smp_send_stop(int wait)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> - unsigned long wait;
>> + unsigned long timeout;
>>
>> if (reboot_force)
>> return;
>> @@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ static void native_smp_send_stop(void)
>> if (num_online_cpus() > 1) {
>> apic->send_IPI_allbutself(REBOOT_VECTOR);
>>
>> - /* Don't wait longer than a second */
>> - wait = USEC_PER_SEC;
>> - while (num_online_cpus() > 1 && wait--)
>> + /* Don't wait longer than a second if this not a synchronous call */
>> + timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
>> + while (num_online_cpus() > 1 && (wait || timeout--))
>> udelay(1);
>> }
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c 2010-08-30 16:20:50.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c 2010-10-07 16:49:00.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ static void xen_reboot(int reason)
>> struct sched_shutdown r = { .reason = reason };
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> - smp_send_stop();
>> + smp_send_stop(0);
>> #endif
>>
>> if (HYPERVISOR_sched_op(SCHEDOP_shutdown, &r))
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/xen/smp.c 2010-08-30 16:20:50.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/xen/smp.c 2010-10-07 16:46:27.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static void stop_self(void *v)
>> BUG();
>> }
>>
>> -static void xen_smp_send_stop(void)
>> +static void xen_smp_send_stop(int wait)
>> {
>> smp_call_function(stop_self, NULL, 0);
>> }
>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/s390/char/sclp_quiesce.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/s390/char/sclp_quiesce.c 2010-08-03 12:45:04.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/s390/char/sclp_quiesce.c 2010-10-07 16:49:12.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static void do_machine_quiesce(void)
>> {
>> psw_t quiesce_psw;
>>
>> - smp_send_stop();
>> + smp_send_stop(0);
>> quiesce_psw.mask = PSW_BASE_BITS | PSW_MASK_WAIT;
>> quiesce_psw.addr = 0xfff;
>> __load_psw(quiesce_psw);
>> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/reboot.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/reboot.h 2010-08-03 12:46:08.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/reboot.h 2010-10-07 16:44:21.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ extern void machine_restart(char *cmd);
>> extern void machine_halt(void);
>> extern void machine_power_off(void);
>>
>> -extern void machine_shutdown(void);
>> +extern void machine_shutdown(int wait);
>> struct pt_regs;
>> extern void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *);
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/smp.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/smp.h 2010-08-03 12:46:08.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/smp.h 2010-10-07 16:49:41.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpuid,
>> /*
>> * stops all CPUs but the current one:
>> */
>> -extern void smp_send_stop(void);
>> +extern void smp_send_stop(int wait);
>>
>> /*
>> * sends a 'reschedule' event to another CPU:
>> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ extern unsigned int setup_max_cpus;
>>
>> #else /* !SMP */
>>
>> -static inline void smp_send_stop(void) { }
>> +static inline void smp_send_stop(int wait) { }
>>
>> /*
>> * These macros fold the SMP functionality into a single CPU system
>> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/kexec.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/kexec.c 2010-10-07 14:33:57.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/kexec.c 2010-10-07 16:45:38.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ int kernel_kexec(void)
>> {
>> kernel_restart_prepare(NULL);
>> printk(KERN_EMERG "Starting new kernel\n");
>> - machine_shutdown();
>> + machine_shutdown(1);
>> }
>>
>> machine_kexec(kexec_image);
>> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/panic.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/panic.c 2010-08-30 16:22:03.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/panic.c 2010-10-07 16:50:05.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt,
>> * unfortunately means it may not be hardened to work in a panic
>> * situation.
>> */
>> - smp_send_stop();
>> + smp_send_stop(0);
>>
>> atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/