Re: + softirq-cleanup-preempt-check.patch added to -mm tree

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 23:04 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> +static inline void softirq_preempt_check(struct softirq_action *h,
> >> +            int prev_count)
> > 
> > unnecessary linebreak.
> 
> How unnecessary is this linebreak:
> $ wc -c
> static inline void softirq_preempt_check(struct softirq_action *h, int
> prev_count)
> 83
> 
> People, including me, still work with 80-col terminals. What I can
> tolerate are undivided strings, because it sucks if one cannot grep for
> anything from the log 

I actually work on ~350 character wide terminals, but then, I vert-split
it 4-ways so I end up with ~85 chars per column.. :-)

But I agree the line should be split, I however much prefer the form:

static inline
void softirq_preempt_check(struct softirq_action *h, int prev_count)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/