Re: [PATCH] regulator: avoid deadlock when disabling regulatorwith supply

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:43:54PM -0500, Jeffrey Carlyle wrote:

> I have a regulator A that sets regulator B as its supply. When I call
> set_supply to add B as the supply for A, regulator A gets added to the
> supply_list for regulator B.

Looks good, thanks!

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

but some stylistic things below:

> Change-Id: I769669452b9e1b59b252298d589738aabb03529c

Hrm?

>  static int _regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
>  static int _regulator_get_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
>  static unsigned int _regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
> @@ -1343,12 +1344,14 @@ int regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
>  	mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
>  	ret = _regulator_enable(rdev);
>  	mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_enable);

Random indentation change here.

> +
> +	if (supply_rdev)
> +		regulator_disable(
> +				get_device_regulator(rdev_get_dev(supply_rdev))
> +				);
> +

Eew, indentation!  In cases like this it's better to just ignore the
excesive line length.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/