Re: [PATCH] sysctl: fix min/max handling in__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax()

From: AmÃrico Wang
Date: Fri Oct 08 2010 - 12:11:45 EST


On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:51:21AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010 Ã 17:25 +0800, AmÃrico Wang a Ãcrit :
>> >>
>> >
>> >Here is the final one.
>>
>> Oops, that one is not correct. Hopefully this one
>> is correct.
>>
>> --------------->
>>
>> Eric D. noticed that we may trigger an OOPS if we leave ->extra{1,2}
>> to NULL when we use proc_doulongvec_minmax().
>>
>> Actually, we don't need to store min/max values in a vector,
>> because all the elements in the vector should share the same min/max
>> value, like what proc_dointvec_minmax() does.
>>
>
>If we assert same min/max limits are to be applied to all elements,
>a much simpler fix than yours would be :
>
>diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
>index f88552c..8e45451 100644
>--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
>+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
>@@ -2485,7 +2485,7 @@ static int __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(void *data, struct ctl_table *table, int
> kbuf[left] = 0;
> }
>
>- for (; left && vleft--; i++, min++, max++, first=0) {
>+ for (; left && vleft--; i++, first=0) {
> unsigned long val;
>
> if (write) {
>
>
>Please dont send huge patches like this to 'fix' a bug,
>especially on slow path.

Well, my patch makes that horrible code a little better. :)

>
>First we fix the bug, _then_ we can try to make code more
>efficient or more pretty or shorter.
>
>So the _real_ question is :
>
>Should the min/max limits should be a single pair,
>shared by all elements, or a vector of limits.
>

Yes, actually I talked with Eric W. about this before
sending the patch.

I also checked the users of proc_doulongvec_minmax(),
none of them are using more than one limit, so it is
safe to remove that.


--
Live like a child, think like the god.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/