On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:42:05PM -0400, Chen Gong wrote:ä 10/2/2010 11:26 AM, Guenter Roeck åé:On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 05:59:59AM -0000, Chen Gong wrote:Sorry for late. I just come back from my holiday. If only this one patchpkgtemp is derived from coretemp, so some reasonableHi,
logics should be applied onto pkgtemp, too. Such as
the init logic here.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gong<gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
this patch, when applied with CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU undefined, causes a compile failure
because it tries to access pkgtemp_cpu_notifier which is not defined in this case.
For that reason, I have removed the patch from the list of applied patches for -next.
Please re-submit a version which compiles for all combinations of HOTPLUG_CPU and SMP
defined/undefined.
Thanks,
Guenter
is applied, it is broken, but it will be OK after these 2 patches are
applied. I tested the patches when CONFIG_SMP is undefined, it does be
Each patch by itself must be compilable, otherwise we break the ability
to bisect. Not a good idea.
broken again. My suggestion is adding a macro definiton in the pkgtemp.c
like "#include<asm/smp.h>". If it is doable, I will re-post a new patch
series
I assume you mean to add the include directive. Yes, that should do it,
but please make sure that it compiles.
Thanks,
Guenter