Re: [patch 00/47] Sparse irq rework

[Yinghai Lu]

On 10/06/2010 09:01 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
>> On 10/06/2010 04:37 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> On 10/06/2010 03:52 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/05/2010 03:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>>>>>> Okay, patch 14 looks good to me too (including Yinghai's comment).
>>>>>>>> The new allocator seems sane, and I didn't see any obvious errors in
>>>>>>>> patches 16-47.  I've not tested any of this yet.  Hopefully I'll be
>>>>>>>> able to carve out some time to do so early this week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wait until I pushed out a fixed tree. In meantime I found out how I
>>>>>>> managed to screw up the quilt series :(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will post, once it's ready.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pushed out an updated tree to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/linux-2.6-sparse-irq.git master
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> test it together with tip, it seems all io apic routing is not set rightly. MSI is ok...
>>>>>
>>>>> [  200.290040] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: PCI INT A -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 23
>>>>> [  200.290991] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: setting latency timer to 64
>>>>> [  200.310002] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: EHCI Host Controller
>>>>> [  200.310455] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
>>>>> [  200.330127] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: debug port 1
>>>>> [  200.334395] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: cache line size of 256 is not supported
>>>>> [  200.350042] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: request interrupt 23 failed
>>>>> [  200.350491] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: USB bus 1 deregistered
>>>>> [  200.372257] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: PCI INT A disabled
>>>>> [  200.372644] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: init 0000:00:1d.7 fail, -38
>>>>> [  200.389916] ehci_hcd: probe of 0000:00:1d.7 failed with error -38
>>>>
>>>> Yep. Ingo's testing found that already. Does the patch below fix it ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> 	tglx
>>>> ---
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>>>> index 2f171df..eb3d01d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>>>> @@ -252,11 +252,15 @@ static struct irq_cfg *alloc_irq_and_cfg_at(unsigned int at, int node)
>>>>  static struct irq_cfg *get_irq_cfg_at(unsigned int at, int node)
>>>>  {
>>>>  	int res = irq_alloc_desc_at(at, node);
>>>> +	struct irq_data *data;
>>>>  
>>>>  	if (res < 0 && res != -EEXIST)
>>>>  		return NULL;
>>>>  
>>>> -	return get_irq_chip_data(at);
>>>> +	data = irq_get_irq_data(at);
>>>> +	if (res >= 0 && !data->chip_data)
>>>> +		data->chip_data = alloc_irq_cfg(at, node);
>>>> +	return data->chip_data;
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>>  static int alloc_irq_from(unsigned int from, int node)
>>>
>>> yes, it fixes the problem.
>>>
>>> but can you merge get_irq_cfg_at() and alloc_irq_and_cfg_at() ? 
>>> it's confusing to let get_...() to do the alloc work.
> 
> Well, I'm not too happy about this preallocated stuff anyway, which is
> the reason for the warning below.
>  
>> [   80.726176] WARNING: at drivers/pci/intr_remapping.c:67 irq_2_iommu_alloc+0x52/0xdc()
>> [   80.745935] Hardware name: Sun Fire X4800
>> [   80.746179] irq_2_iommu!=NULL irq 8
> 

no, irq_2_iommu are all dynamically allocated even for irq < 16.

that trace look like pnpacpi try to register the irq.

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/