Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C

[Daniel Walker]

On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:30 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Is there some way to force GCC to do what I want (interleave the
> functions)? It seems happy to inline them and then optimize the
> register
> usage and instruction ordering. Perhaps that is OK though and we're
> wasting our time trying to be conservative in code size. 

Is it possible to do all this in assembly ? Can't you have the default
implementation using this assembly with different function names, then
just set the assembly function names in C code someplace?

Daniel

-- 
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/