Re: [patch 20/47] x86: Remove useless reinitialization of irq descriptors

[Eric W. Biederman]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The descriptors are already initialized in exaclty this way.

They aren't only status is initialized exactly that way.

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c |   17 ++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ int vector_used_by_percpu_irq(unsigned i
>  
>  void __init init_ISA_irqs(void)
>  {
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = legacy_pic->chip;
> +	const char *name = chip->name;
>  	int i;
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC)
> @@ -107,19 +109,8 @@ void __init init_ISA_irqs(void)
>  #endif
>  	legacy_pic->init(0);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * 16 old-style INTA-cycle interrupts:
> -	 */

Why delete the comment here?

> -	for (i = 0; i < legacy_pic->nr_legacy_irqs; i++) {
> -		struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(i);
> -
> -		desc->status = IRQ_DISABLED;
> -		desc->action = NULL;
> -		desc->depth = 1;
> -
> -		set_irq_chip_and_handler_name(i, &i8259A_chip,
> -					      handle_level_irq, "XT");
> -	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < legacy_pic->nr_legacy_irqs; i++)
> +		set_irq_chip_and_handler_name(i, chip, handle_level_irq, name);
>  }
>  
>  void __init init_IRQ(void)

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/