Re: [RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: unnecesary double free inpcc_cpufreq_do_osc

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 07:47:23AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:

 > > I think Dave's patch is correct.  There's a kfree(output.pointer) at line 359.
 > > If we fall all the way through without hitting any of the return -ENODEVs,
 > > we end up doing a 2nd kfree in the out_free:
 > 
 > There's a second call to acpi_evaluate_object() which takes "output" as 
 > its argument and allocates more memory.

yup. I merged your patch. after it's soaked in -next for a day, I'll push it to
Linus.  (Looks obviously correct, but just being extra careful given where
we are in the release cycle)

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/