[patch 22/47] x86: lguest: Convert to new irq chip functions

[Thomas Gleixner]

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/lguest/boot.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-tip/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
@@ -788,22 +788,22 @@ static void lguest_flush_tlb_kernel(void
  * simple as setting a bit.  We don't actually "ack" interrupts as such, we
  * just mask and unmask them.  I wonder if we should be cleverer?
  */
-static void disable_lguest_irq(unsigned int irq)
+static void disable_lguest_irq(struct irq_data *data)
 {
-	set_bit(irq, lguest_data.blocked_interrupts);
+	set_bit(data->irq, lguest_data.blocked_interrupts);
 }
 
-static void enable_lguest_irq(unsigned int irq)
+static void enable_lguest_irq(struct irq_data *data)
 {
-	clear_bit(irq, lguest_data.blocked_interrupts);
+	clear_bit(data->irq, lguest_data.blocked_interrupts);
 }
 
 /* This structure describes the lguest IRQ controller. */
 static struct irq_chip lguest_irq_controller = {
 	.name		= "lguest",
-	.mask		= disable_lguest_irq,
-	.mask_ack	= disable_lguest_irq,
-	.unmask		= enable_lguest_irq,
+	.irq_mask	= disable_lguest_irq,
+	.irq_mask_ack	= disable_lguest_irq,
+	.irq_unmask	= enable_lguest_irq,
 };
 
 /*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/