Re: [PATCH 05/24] i2c: change to new flag variable

From: Jean Delvare
Date: Wed Sep 29 2010 - 09:56:31 EST


On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:07:26 -0700, matt mooney wrote:
> On 09:29 Sun 26 Sep , Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:12:17 -0700, matt mooney wrote:
> > > Sam had implemented these newer style flag variables a while back as an
> > > eloquent way of handling conditional flags. A lot of newer (and some older)
> > > modules and subsystems were using them already, so to provide uniformity and for
> > > an eventual removal of the deprecated flags, I converted all remaining instances
> > > to the newer style. (IMHO, I think it flows better with the way the rest of the
> > > build system works.)
> >
> > Fine with me. What's the planned merge path for this patch? Will you
> > push all the patches upstream yourself, or do you expect me to pick
> > this one?
>
> I was hoping subsystem maintainers would pick them up, but a lot of the patches
> have been acked without being applied. My new plan is to have the unapplied ones
> go through the kbuild tree. So you can either pick it up or just ack it.

I've picked the patch, it's now in my i2c tree, scheduled for merge in 2.6.37.

--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/