Re: [PATCH 3/6] secmark: export binary yes/no rather than kernelinternal secid

[Mr Dash Four]

> > In netlink, we can obsolete fields without breaking backward
> > compatibility. Applications parsing the /proc entry may break, but they
> > should use stable interfaces (like netlink) instead.
> >     
>
> Which I take as a pro stance on not adding any more procfs fields.
>   
How did you figure that one out then?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/