Re: kexec load failure introduced by "x86, memblock: Replace e820_/_earlystring with memblock_"

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Mon Sep 27 2010 - 19:33:11 EST


On 09/27/2010 04:26 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 04:20 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> x86 own version for find_area?
>>
>
> No, double no.
>
> Same kind of crap: overloading an interface with semantics it shouldn't
> have. The right thing is to introduce a new interface with carries the
> explicitly needed policy with it... e.g. memblock_find_in_range_lowest().
>
> That interface would have the explicit semantics of returning the lowest
> possible address, as opposed to any suitable address (which may change
> if policy requirements change.)
>
> The other question is why does kexec need this in the first place? Is
> this due to a design bug in kexec or is there some fundamental reason
> for this?

bzImage is used here. so need range below 4g.

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/