Re: 2.6.36-rc5+: drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c:506: error: implicitdeclaration of function 'cpu_sibling_mask'

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Sun Sep 26 2010 - 18:40:25 EST


On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:17:50 +0200 Thomas Meyer wrote:

> $ make V=2
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh - due to target is PHONY
> CHK include/generated/compile.h
> CC [M] drivers/hwmon/coretemp.o - due to target missing
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c: In function 'coretemp_device_remove':
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c:506: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_sibling_mask'
> make[2]: *** [drivers/hwmon/coretemp.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/hwmon] Error 2
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>
> above function is not defined on UP.

Patch just posted:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/26/112


> This commit introduced the error:
>
> commit e40cc4bdfd4b89813f072f72bd9c7055814d3f0f
> Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon Sep 13 10:23:05 2010 +0000
>
> x86/hwmon: register alternate sibling upon CPU removal
>
> Just like pkgtemp registers another core of the same package when one
> gets removed, coretemp should register another hyperthread (if
> available) in that situation.
>
> As pointed out in the patch fixing the respective code in pkgtemp, the
> list protectng mutex must be dropped before calling
> coretemp_device_add(), and due to the restructured loop (including an
> explicit return) the "safe" variant of the list iterator isn't needed
> anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rudolf Marek <r.marek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> --


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/