Re: [PATCH 0/5] uio hotplug support

[Eric W. Biederman]

"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:14:11AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:19:59AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Implement the ability to hotunplug a uio device while file handles
>> >> are still open without crashing.
>> >
>> > Could you please create patches that apply on top of your already
>> > accepted UIO changes?
>> 
>> That is what the patches I sent should be.  My apologies if I had not
>> made that clear.  Certainly these patches were built against my previous
>> changes, on top of 2.6.36-rc4.  Are you having problems?
>
> Hmm, I applied your first series of 5 patches (which I signed-off). When
> trying to apply your second series, I get this from quilt:
>
> Applying patch 2_1-Simplify-the-lifetime-logic-of-struct-uio_device.patch
> patching file drivers/uio/uio.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 287 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 312 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 339.
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 806 (offset 17 lines).
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 831.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 858.
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 889.
> 4 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file drivers/uio/uio.c
> Patch 2_1-Simplify-the-lifetime-logic-of-struct-uio_device.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
>
> The first series applied without any fuzz against 2.6.36-rc5.

Bizarre.  I will take a look.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/