Re: [PATCH] spi_mpc8xxx: issue with using definition of pram inDevice Tree

[Scott Wood]

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:57:40 +0400
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Doesn't explain why that worked on MPC8272 (CPM2) and MPC8560
> (also CPM2) machines though. But here's my guess (I no longer
> have these boards to test it):
> 
> On 8272 I used this node:
> 
> +                       spi@4c0 {
> +                               #address-cells = <1>;
> +                               #size-cells = <0>;
> +                               compatible = "fsl,cpm2-spi", "fsl,spi";
> +                               reg = <0x11a80 0x40 0x89fc 0x2>;
> 
> On that SOC there are two muram data regions 0x0..0x2000 and
> 0x9000..0x9100. Note that we actually don't want "data" regions,
> and the only reason why that worked is that sysdev/cpm_common.c
> maps muram(0)..muram(max).

Wouldn't it still fail the rh_alloc_fixed call?

-Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/