Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the originaldirection for latter use

[Patrick McHardy]

Am 21.09.2010 02:02, schrieb Changli Gao:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Sure we can, dropping unconfirmed conntracks is a rare exception,
>> not a common case. Even under DoS we usually drop *unassured*
>> conntracks, which have already enterered the hash. If we're unable
>> to do that, we won't even allocate a new conntrack.
>>
> 
> Even so, saving the hash of the reply tuple isn't a good idea.
> 
> If NAT is turned on, the current code is:
> 
> mangle the reply tuple -> compute the hash of the reply tuple ->
> insert into the conntrack hash table.
> 
> the new code is
> 
> compute the hash of the reply tuple -> mangle the reply tuple ->
> recompute the hash of the reply tuple -> insert into the conntrack
> hash table.
> 
> As you see, the hash computing is done twice, and we use more CPU
> cycles than before.

You're right of course, we actually don't compute the reply hash
before inserting the conntrack into the hash table (except in a
few NAT cases, but we can look at those later).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/