On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:56:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 12:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:59:29AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> > writing 0 to eventfd does nothing. The way to deassert irq
> >> That is implementation detail of current irqfd. It was designed for MSI
> >> not level triggered interrupts.
> >
> >Maybe we should add a check that gsi is mapped to MSI (or unmapped) then?
> >Level which switches to 1 and back to 0 immediately will be racy anyway
> >...
> >
>
> Add a check where?
I would make sure that if you bind irqfd to a non-MSI GSI,
signalling it has no effect.