Re: [PATCH 0/17]: New SCSI target framework (SCST) with dev handlersand 2 target drivers

[Bart Van Assche]

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:36:30PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Please review this second iteration of the patch set of the new
> > (although, perhaps, the oldest) SCSI target framework for Linux SCST
> > with a set of dev handlers and 2 target drivers: for local access
> > (scst_local) and for Infiniband SRP (srpt).
> >
>
> [ ... ]
>
> And too many "naked returns", I believe common style is to only have
> return for non-void functions.

Hello Dmitry,

If there is agreement among kernel maintainers that return statements
at the end of functions that do not return a value should be avoided,
it might be a good idea to let checkpatch complain about such return
statements. Currently checkpatch doesn't complain about such return
statements.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/