Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] scsi: Convert structScsi_Host->cmd_serial_number to atomic_t

[Nicholas A. Bellinger]

On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 21:45 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 09/17/2010 02:03 PM, Joe Eykholt wrote:
> >
> > How about instead of adding use_serial_number, let's just have the
> > drivers that want a serial number call scsi_cmd_get_serial()
> 
> I think this sounds better.
> 

In that case I will go ahead and add explict scsi_cmd_get_serial() calls
to the LLDs that use struct scsi_cmnd->serial_number in anything beyond
an obvious and simple informational purpose.

> You could also convert drivers to the host tagging if you needed a 
> unique id for each command sent to a host.

Hmmm, what does this entail again..?

> 
> > and stop calling it from scsi_dispatch_cmd()?   AFAICT, it's only
> > used in debug messages in some drivers.  I didn't find other usages
> > but didn't do an exhaustive search.
> 
> The comments for serial_number say that it is only supposed to be used 
> for debugging printks and most drivers use it for that.

So I would suppose it would be OK for those drivers to continue to
printk serial_number to show the internal serial_number allocation is
now disabled by default.

> However, it looks like mpt and dpt_i2o are using it for error handling
> and/or lookup type of operations. I think the mpt* uses are not needed
> in the abort checks.
> 

In that case, then adding an explict scsi_cmd_get_serial() call in mpt*
and dpt_i20 ->queuecommand() callers would be a good first step.

> And eata is using it for ordering and tracking or something. It could 
> probably be converted to the host tagging if or what you suggested if it 
> needs the uniqueue id.

Adding an explict scsi_cmd_get_serial() for eata for now, and we can
consider LLD canidates for host tag conversion as a future step.

> 
> zfcp looks like it copies it. It does not look like the driver needs it.
> 

Ok, I will look at removing it's usage in zfcp or if necessary add an
the explict scsi_cmd_get_serial() call.

> scsi_error.c uses it in scsi_try_to_abort_cmd to check if a command has 
> completed, but I think that can be done by checking if REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE 
> is set.

Hmmm, good catch here.  Jejb and hch, does this item work for you..?

If so then I will take another peek for any ML uses of a struct
scsi_cmnd->serial_number that need to be addressed, and include Joe's
and Mike's recommendations into a v3 series.

Thanks for your comments here Mike!

--nab


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/