Re: [PATCH 0/2] ia64: possible module unwind table optimisation

[Tony Luck]

> This is a shame, but not a real problem in the context of my patch - you can't
> usefully optimise something that's seemingly almost never used. It can be filed
> in the cylindrical filing cabinet.

I'll probably apply it anyway ... it looks like it will be useful when
I get things like this
working.  The initial problem with kmemleak seems to be configuration related. I
cut back from 4096 cpus on 1024 nodes to a more modest 32 cpus on 8 nodes,
and my system boots.  Still can't test your patch because although debugfs got
configured and apparently built-in ok ... I can't see it in
/proc/filesystems, so it
won't mount.

Thanks

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/