Re: [PATCH 0/3] BDI handling fixes

[Jan Kara]

On Thu 16-09-10 19:47:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:44:08AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > 
> >   Hi,
> > 
> >   series of these three patches fixes the warning in __mark_inode_dirty()
> > which happens when I do e.g. touch /dev/zero. The first two patches should
> > be obvious enough and probably worth merging independently of the third
> > patch. The third patch is upto a discussion whether we want to solve the
> > problem that way or differently. Christoph, I know we spoke at LSF that
> > inode_to_bdi() could be a per-sb method but the current version of the
> > patch seems clean enough to me that we could maybe go even without the
> > special callback?
> 
> Feel free to go with the simpler one.  But what I think really needs to
> be changes is the no writeback flag - it's exactly the wrong way around.
> 
> Instead just add a flag to allow writeback for the block device and
> fs-specific bdi structures.
  Agreed. I just think that I'll first make the flags right and then just
mechanically flip NO_WRITEBACK and WRITEBACK...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/