Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-llseek tree with the rr tree

[Amit Shah]

On (Thu) Sep 16 2010 [10:20:01], Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 16 September 2010 08:54:39 Amit Shah wrote:
> > Arnd, the device is supposed to be non-seekable so I'll add a
> > nonseekable_open() to the open() call.
> > 
> > So I guess the llseek operation should ne no_llseek instead of
> > noop_llseek.  Will you change that in your patchset?  Should I do that
> > in the patch I'll queue up?
> 
> Yes, I think it's best if you just do both changes in your patch, I'll
> drop this file from my series then.

Great, I'll queue that up.

		Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/