Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: catch spurious interrupts after disablingcounters

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:21:10PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> When you do perf record foo, it's equivalent to
> perf record -e cycles:uk -F 1000 foo
>

yup, thanks
 
> I think there is a problem with perf record in case you provide
> multiple events. It is going to sample on all of them at the same
> frequency. You may not always want that, but I don't think there
> is a way to change that.
> 

indeed, without perf-tool code changes but i think you still may run
multiple instances of perf-tool :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/