Re: [PATCH 2/2] tcm_loop: Add DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL CDB support

[Boaz Harrosh]

On 09/15/2010 02:06 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This patch series adds DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL CDB to the TCM_Loop Virtual SCSI
> LLD module.  This includes the following changes:
> 
> 	*) Add call to include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h:scsi_bidi_cmnd() to set
> 	   TCM struct se_cmd internal data_direction in tcm_loop_allocate_core_cmd()
> 	*) Update tcm_loop_new_cmd_map() to handle BIDI READ payload from scsi_in()
> 	*) Drop DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL usage check from tcm_loop_queuecommand()
> 	*) Add tcm_loop_slave_alloc() and tcm_loop_slave_configure() handlers for
> 	   struct scsi_host_template to set QUEUE_FLAG_BIDI in the former.
> 
> So far this has been tested together with commit 1f8f3eda132c using XDWRITE_READ_10
> via BSG userspace code on a v2.6.36-rc3 kernel.
> 

I'll start the review with this patch. Then we'll move on to the bigger harder one.

> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric_scsi.c |   48 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric_scsi.c b/drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric_scsi.c
> index 644f978..c4139d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric_scsi.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static struct se_cmd *tcm_loop_allocate_core_cmd(
>  	struct tcm_loop_nexus *tl_nexus = tl_hba->tl_nexus;
>  	struct tcm_loop_cmd *tl_cmd;
>  	int sam_task_attr;
> +	enum dma_data_direction data_direction;
>  
>  	if (!(tl_nexus)) {
>  		scmd_printk(KERN_ERR, sc, "TCM_Loop I_T Nexus"
> @@ -81,6 +82,13 @@ static struct se_cmd *tcm_loop_allocate_core_cmd(
>  	 * Save the pointer to struct scsi_cmnd *sc
>  	 */
>  	tl_cmd->sc = sc;
> +	/*
> +	 * Check for scsi_bidi_cmnd() to signal TCM Core for DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> +	 */
> +	if (scsi_bidi_cmnd(sc))
> +		data_direction = DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL;
> +	else
> +		data_direction = sc->sc_data_direction;

So you noticed that scsi-ml has a data_direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE and
scsi_bidi_cmnd(sc) == true. I think you could do the same and code will
be more simple, see below.

So for start this here is just droped

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Locate the SAM Task Attr from struct scsi_cmnd *
> @@ -105,7 +113,7 @@ static struct se_cmd *tcm_loop_allocate_core_cmd(
>  	 * Initialize struct se_cmd descriptor from target_core_mod infrastructure
>  	 */
>  	transport_init_se_cmd(se_cmd, se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo, se_sess,
> -			scsi_bufflen(sc), sc->sc_data_direction, sam_task_attr,
> +			scsi_bufflen(sc), data_direction, sam_task_attr,

And this is dropped

>  			&tl_cmd->tl_sense_buf[0]);
>  	/*
>  	 * Locate the struct se_lun pointer and attach it to struct se_cmd
> @@ -128,14 +136,16 @@ static struct se_cmd *tcm_loop_allocate_core_cmd(
>  /*
>   * Called by struct target_core_fabric_ops->new_cmd_map()
>   *
> - * Always called in process context
> + * Always called in process context.  A non zero return value
> + * here will signal to handle an exception based on the return code.
>   */
>  int tcm_loop_new_cmd_map(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
>  {
>  	struct tcm_loop_cmd *tl_cmd = container_of(se_cmd,
>  				struct tcm_loop_cmd, tl_se_cmd);
>  	struct scsi_cmnd *sc = tl_cmd->sc;
> -	void *mem_ptr;
> +	void *mem_ptr, *mem_bidi_ptr = NULL;
> +	u32 sg_no_bidi = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  	/*
>  	 * Allocate the necessary tasks to complete the received CDB+data
> @@ -163,6 +173,16 @@ int tcm_loop_new_cmd_map(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
>  	if (scsi_sg_count(sc)) {
>  		se_cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_PASSTHROUGH_SG_TO_MEM;
>  		mem_ptr = (void *)scsi_sglist(sc);
> +		/*
> +		 * For BIDI commands, pass in the extra READ buffer
> +		 * to transport_generic_map_mem_to_cmd() below..
> +		 */
> +		if (se_cmd->data_direction == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) {

Just change to if (scsi_bidi_cmnd(sc))
[remember data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE]

> +			struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb = scsi_in(sc);
> +
> +			mem_bidi_ptr = (void *)sdb->table.sgl;
> +			sg_no_bidi = sdb->table.nents;

This is the all bidi secret the presence of the  scsi_in buffer

> +		}
>  	} else {
>  		/*
>  		 * Used for DMA_NONE
> @@ -322,15 +342,6 @@ static int tcm_loop_queuecommand(
>  	}
>  	tl_tpg = &tl_hba->tl_hba_tpgs[sc->device->id];transport_get_task
>  	se_tpg = &tl_tpg->tl_se_tpg;
> -
> -	if (sc->sc_data_direction == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) {
> -		spin_lock_irq(host->host_lock);
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "Unsupported BIDI sc->sc_data_direction: %d\n",
> -			sc->sc_data_direction);	
> -		sc->result = host_byte(DID_ERROR);
> -		(*done)(sc);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Determine the SAM Task Attribute and allocate tl_cmd and
>  	 * tl_cmd->tl_se_cmd from TCM infrastructure
> @@ -446,6 +457,17 @@ release:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int tcm_loop_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sd)
> +{
> +	set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_BIDI, &sd->request_queue->queue_flags);

Thank got, another new one. We are up to 4

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tcm_loop_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sd)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct scsi_host_template tcm_loop_driver_template = {
>  	.proc_info		= tcm_loop_proc_info,
>  	.proc_name		= "tcm_loopback",
> @@ -468,6 +490,8 @@ static struct scsi_host_template tcm_loop_driver_template = {
>  	.cmd_per_lun		= TL_SCSI_CMD_PER_LUN,
>  	.max_sectors		= TL_SCSI_MAX_SECTORS,
>  	.use_clustering		= DISABLE_CLUSTERING,
> +	.slave_alloc		= tcm_loop_slave_alloc,
> +	.slave_configure	= tcm_loop_slave_configure,
>  	.module			= THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  

Boaz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/