Re: [BISECTED] 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown to unusability (HPET)

[Nix]

On 14 Sep 2010, Thomas Gleixner said:

> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Nix wrote:
>> > 
>> > I suspect current_clocksource doesn't do what we think it does, or the
>> > clocksource and 'clock event device' are not the same.)
>> 
>> Right, they are not the same. clocksource provides us a read out
>> device for timekeeping (usually a simple increasing counter). clock
>> event device is used to generate timer interrupts.
>> 
>> HPET provides both functionalities.
>> 
>> The patch you bisected is affecting the clock events part of the
>> HPET. So yes, it's not a clock source problem.
>
> Another question. If you add hpet=verbose (or revert that commit) does
> the printk_once in hpet_set_next_event() show up in dmesg ?
>
>     "hpet: compare register read back failed."

Well, given that I reverted that commit in the past (during the
bisection) and also added hpet=verbose[1], I'd have expected it to turn
up in my past syslogs. There is no sign of it, in syslogs back to 2009.


[1] and indeed am running 2.6.35.4 with hpet=verbose and no symptoms
    on the affected system *now* -- a mystery because I thought the
    hpet=verbose-turns-it-off code was removed, but turning on verbose
    still seems to quash the bug?! or perhaps it's slightly
    intermittent and every N boots I'm lucky enough to miss it. I'm
    slightly chary of rebooting to find out ;}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/