Re: [PATCH 1/2] SLUB: Fix merged slab cache names

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Tue Sep 14 2010 - 13:47:18 EST


On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> > Put this into mm/slub.c as slub only flag? What is the difference from
> > refcount == 1?
> I can put it in mm/slub.c but I was worried about someone reusing the bit for
> something else.

Allocate from the other end like __OBJECT_POISON.

> Do you mean refcount == 2? You don't know during kmem cache release time if
> someone was merged to the cache or not.

> > Ok. Keeping the original name. Why dont we do strdup by default and always
> > do a kfree(s->name) on close?
> >
> I tried that. It gets very nasty during bootstrap.

Add it only to kmem_cache_create() not to kmem_cache_open. That is not
used during bootstrap. The bootstrap caches do not matter since they are
never freed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/