Re: [PATCH] USB device driver of Topcliff PCH

[Valdis . Kletnieks]

On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:50:45 +0200, Maurus Cuelenaere said:

> Ah, well IMHO it's better not to spam LKML with subsystem-related stuff..

On the flip side, posting to LKML as well means that it's a bit harder for a
patch series to go totally down a rathole, because people outside the subsystem
then have a chance to look at the code and point out where it's going in the
wrong direction. My last code comment was regarding hardware I didn't have, and
happened because I asked myself "What would happen if that code tried to run on
my laptop?".  Similarly, we see lots of stuff posted that looks good to those
of us on 1-4 core systems, only to have somebody from SGI point out that it
will add 45 hours to boot time on one of their big boxes.  And so on.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature