Re: [KVM timekeeping 10/35] Fix deep C-state TSC desynchronization

From: Avi Kivity
Date: Tue Sep 14 2010 - 05:27:37 EST


On 09/14/2010 11:10 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 20.08.2010 10:07, Zachary Amsden wrote:
When CPUs with unstable TSCs enter deep C-state, TSC may stop
running. This causes us to require resynchronization. Since
we can't tell when this may potentially happen, we assume the
worst by forcing re-compensation for it at every point the VCPU
task is descheduled.

Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden<zamsden@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7fc4a55..52b6c21 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
}

kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
- if (unlikely(vcpu->cpu != cpu)) {
+ if (unlikely(vcpu->cpu != cpu) || check_tsc_unstable()) {
/* Make sure TSC doesn't go backwards */
s64 tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc ? 0 :
native_read_tsc() - vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc;
For yet unknown reason, this commit breaks Linux guests here if they are
started with only a single VCPU. They hang during boot, obviously no
longer receiving interrupts.

I'm using kvm-kmod against a 2.6.34 host kernel, so this may be a side
effect of the wrapping, though I cannot imagine how.

Anyone any ideas?



Most likely, time went backwards, and some 'future - past' calculation resulted in a negative sleep value which was then interpreted as unsigned and resulted in a 2342525634 year sleep.

Does your guest use kvmclock, tsc, or some other time source?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/