Re: [linux-pm] wacom + runtime PM = AA deadlock

[Oliver Neukum]

Am Montag, 13. September 2010, 22:02:16 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > Is there any point in resuming the device during close() just in order
> > > to kill the interrupt URB?  It seems counterproductive -- if the device 
> > > had been suspended then there wouldn't be any interrupt URB to kill in 
> > > the first place.
> > 
> > Suppose the device does not support remote wakeup. It would never
> > be autosuspended while it is open, but simply resetting the flag
> > would never reach the PM layer.
> 
> Whoops, that's right.  I didn't see the assignment to 
> needs_remote_wakeup.

Should I have used usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume()?

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/