Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] x86/hwmon: {core,pkg,via-cpu}temp_device_remove() can all be __cpuinit

From: Jan Beulich
Date: Tue Sep 14 2010 - 03:35:11 EST


>>> On 14.09.10 at 09:24, Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ä 9/13/2010 6:30 PM, Jan Beulich åé:
>> ... as they're being called only from a __cpuinit function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- linux-2.6.36-rc4/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c 2010-09-13 08:45:02.000000000
> +0200
>> +++ 2.6.36-rc4-x86-hwmon-sections/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c 2010-09-03
> 17:54:14.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ exit:
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> -static void coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>> +static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> struct pdev_entry *p, *n;
>> mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
>> --- linux-2.6.36-rc4/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c 2010-09-13 08:45:03.000000000
> +0200
>> +++ 2.6.36-rc4-x86-hwmon-sections/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c 2010-09-01
> 09:00:45.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ exit:
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> -static void pkgtemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>> +static void __cpuinit pkgtemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> struct pdev_entry *p, *n;
>> unsigned int i;
>> --- linux-2.6.36-rc4/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c 2010-09-13
> 08:45:03.000000000 +0200
>> +++ 2.6.36-rc4-x86-hwmon-sections/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c 2010-09-13
> 00:00:00.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ exit:
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> -static void via_cputemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>> +static void __cpuinit via_cputemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> struct pdev_entry *p, *n;
>> mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I think the change in the coretemp.c is needed but other 2 are
> unnecessary because CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU has covered the codes final
> status after init done.

Perhaps you're right, but (just like was done for coretemp) these
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU conditionals are really superfluous and should
go away.

Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/