Re: [PATCH 2/2] posix clocks: introduce a sysfs presence.

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:31:35AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:00:08AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Also we have existing time sources that don't follow the poxix clock
> > model - I can open /dev/rtc and I can open the hpet and so on.
> > 
> > I like /sys/class/time* *but* you need to be able to open the sysfs
> > device and apply operations to it in order for it to work when your closk
> > can be dynamically created and destroyed and to get a sane Unix API.
> > 
> > To start with try applying permissions to clock sources via the POSIX
> > API. That is something that will be required for some applications.
> > 
> > I need to be able to open sys/clock/foo/something and get a meaningful
> > handle. Sure it's quite likely the operations it supports are related to
> > the POSIX timer ops.
> 
> Do you mean this:
> 
>    id = read(/sys/clock/foo/lock); /* clock is busy, cannot be removed */

That's not for sysfs, if you want to do something like this, create
clockfs please :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/