Re: cgroup: rmdir() does not complete

[Mark Hills]

On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:04:31 +0100 (BST)
> Mark Hills <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The report on the spinning process (23586) is dominated by calls from 
> > mem_cgroup_force_empty.
> > 
> > It seems to show lru_add_drain_all and drain_all_stock_sync are causing 
> > the load (I assume drain_all_stock_sync has been optimised out). But I 
> > don't think this is as important as what causes the spin.
> > 
> 
> I noticed you use FUSE and it seems there is a problem in FUSE v.s. memcg.
> I wrote a patch (onto 2.6.36 but can be applied..)
> 
> Could you try this ? I'm sorry I don't use FUSE system and can't test
> right now.

What makes you conclude that FUSE is in use? I do not think this is the 
case. Or do you mean that it is a problem that the kernel is built with 
FUSE support?

I _can_ test the patch, but I still cannot reliably reproduce the problem 
so it will be hard to conclude whether the patch works or not. Is there a 
way to build a test case for this?

Thanks for your help

-- 
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/