Re: [patch] pm_qos_params: cleanup: terminate a string

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, September 07, 2010, mark gross wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:22:27PM -0700, mark gross wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
...
> 
> updated patch 
> 
> Signed-off-by: mark gross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> --mgross 
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] correct some pr_debug misuse and add a stronger parrameter check to
>  pm_qos_write for the ascii hex value case.  Thanks to Dan Carpenter for
>  pointing out the problem!
> 
> ---
>  kernel/pm_qos_params.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/pm_qos_params.c b/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> index f42d3f7..aae58d2 100644
> --- a/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> +++ b/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void update_target(int pm_qos_class)
>  		call_notifier = 1;
>  		atomic_set(&pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->target_value,
>  				extreme_value);
> -		pr_debug(KERN_ERR "new target for qos %d is %d\n", pm_qos_class,
> +		pr_debug("new target for qos %d is %d\n", pm_qos_class,
>  			atomic_read(&pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->target_value));
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags);

The above doesn't apply to the Linus' tree any more.  Care to fix?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/