Re: [PATCH] netlink: Fix kfree NULL pointer

From: jovi zhang
Date: Wed Sep 08 2010 - 02:14:58 EST


On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 Ã 13:33 +0800, jovi zhang a Ãcrit :
>
>> YES, maybe kfree(NULL) is legal, but I cannot see there have any need
>> to invoke kfree(NULL) in this function.
>> ÂAlso I check kfree usage in other code, I havn't find any kfree(NULL) usage.
>
> We have hundred call sites doing kfree(NULL), if it makes code shorter.
>
> Its usually code path handling exceptions (errors if you prefer), and we
> prefer to use ugly gotos, and even kfree(NULL), to make it as short as
> possible.

OK, I understand.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/