Re: [PATCHv11 2.6.36-rc2-tip 5/15] 5: uprobes: Uprobes(un)registration and exception handling.

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 16:40 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> But that is just the interface - these probes don't nessecarily have to
> be armed and cause global overhead once they are define.  If the
> implenmentation is smart enough it will defer arming the probe until
> we actually use it, and that will be per-process quite often.

The implementation I outlined a few messages ago, would in fact, as you
suggest, avoid arming things when not needed.


> The other things is that perf currently only supports per-kernel pid
> recording, while we'd really need per Posix process, which may contain
> multiple threads for useful tracing of complex userspace applications.
> I also suspect that this will fit the uprobes model much better given
> that the probes will be in any given address space.

perf does report both:

         *      { u32                   pid, tid; } && PERF_SAMPLE_TID

the pid is the process id (thread group leader like) and tid is the
task/thread id.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/