Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: page allocator: Drain per-cpu lists afterdirect reclaim allocation fails

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Sep 03 2010 - 23:17:47 EST


On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:25:45 +1000 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Still, given the improvements in performance from this patchset,
> I'd say inclusion is a no-braniner....

OK, thanks.

It'd be interesting to check the IPI frequency with and without -
/proc/interrupts "CAL" field. Presumably it went down a lot.

I wouldn't bust a gut over it though :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/