Re: ftrace/perf_event leak

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Sep 01 2010 - 07:07:29 EST



* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:38 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 09/01/2010 12:38 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> > >
> > > Then try this:
> >
> > Tested-by: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
> Thanks, queued as:
>
> ---
> Subject: perf, trace: Fix module leak
> From: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed Sep 01 12:58:43 CEST 2010
>
> Commit 1c024eca (perf, trace: Optimize tracepoints by using
> per-tracepoint-per-cpu hlist to track events) caused a module refcount
> leak.
>
> Tested-by: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> LKML-Reference: <4C7E1F12.8030304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Do we need this for -stable too?

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/