Re: 2.6.34.1 page allocation failure

[Pekka Enberg]

 On 8/23/10 1:40 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> > In Stan's case, it's a order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocation but there are
> > only order-0 pages available. Mel, any recent page allocator fixes in
> > 2.6.35 or 2.6.36-rc1 that Stan/Mikael should test?
> This is the TCP slab? Best fix would be in the page allocator. However,
> in this particular case the slub allocator would be able to fall back to
> an order 0 allocation and still satisfy the request.
Looking at the stack trace of the oops, I think Stan has CONFIG_SLAB 
which doesn't have order-0 fallback.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/