Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove alignment padding from ext4_inode_info on64 bit builds

[Richard Kennedy]

On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 15:11 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Richard Kennedy wrote:
> > Reorder structure ext4_inode_info to remove 16 bytes of alignment
> > padding on 64 bit builds. This shrinks its size from 904 to 888 bytes
> > with (CONFIG_EXT4_S_XATTR=y && CONFIG_QUOTA=n).
> >     
> > This will allow this structure to use one fewer cache lines.
> > 
> > Also change type of i_delalloc_reserved_flag to bool to better reflect
> > its usage.
> > 
> > compiled & tested on x86_64
> 
> 
> Looks good to me; there is still a bit of padding at the end:
> 
>         qsize_t                    i_reserved_quota;     /*   864     8 */
>         struct list_head           i_completed_io_list;  /*   872    16 */
>         spinlock_t                 i_completed_io_lock;  /*   888     4 */
> 
>         /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
> 
>         /* --- cacheline 14 boundary (896 bytes) --- */
>         ext4_io_end_t *            cur_aio_dio;          /*   896     8 */
>         tid_t                      i_sync_tid;           /*   904     4 */
>         tid_t                      i_datasync_tid;       /*   908     4 */
> 
> 
> but it wouldn't save a cacheline anyway...
> 
> -Eric
> 
Thanks Eric, yes there is padding but we don't have anything to fill the
hole with :(

If it becomes important to save space, i_state_flags seem to be unused
in ext4 so we could possibly drop that.

With my patch applied, under slub I'm getting one more object per slab
in the ext4_inode_cache

[2.6.35] 17 objects of 960 bytes -- 4 pages per slab
[+patch] 18 objects of 896 bytes -- 4 pages per slab

So I guess that is where most of the write test performance improvement
came from.

regards
Richard


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/