Re: [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup

[Mike Snitzer]

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ian (and others),
>  here's a three-patch series that uses the doubly linked list to do
> your mlock() case hopefully correctly.
>
> NOTE! It's untested. The first patch (which is the slightly scary one)
> is tested to some degree, the two other ones I checked that they
> compile, but that's it.
>
> I'm not going to apply them to my main tree unless they get testing
> and acks. And as mentioned, I've not done any of the changes that
> having a vm_prev pointer can allow in other places.
>
> Comments? Fixes? Braindamage?

In 0002-mm-make-the-mlock-stack-guard-page-checks-stricter.patch you
switch __mlock_vma_pages_range from 'start += PAGE_SIZE' to 'addr +=
PAGE_SIZE'.

So would that be a bugfix for commit d7824370?  Seems likely given
start isn't used after that point.

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/