Re: [Patch] numa:x86_64: Cacheline aliasing makes for_each_populated_zoneextremely expensive -V2.

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 08/18/2010 11:30 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>  
> -	node_data[nodeid] = early_node_mem(nodeid, start, end, pgdat_size,
> +	/*
> +	 * Allocate an extra cacheline per node to reduce cacheline
> +	 * aliasing when scanning all node's node_data.
> +	 */
> +	cache_alias_offset = nodeid * SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> +	node_data[nodeid] = cache_alias_offset +
> +			    early_node_mem(nodeid, start, end,
> +					   pgdat_size + cache_alias_offset,
>  					   SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> -	if (node_data[nodeid] == NULL)
> +	if (node_data[nodeid] == (void *)cache_alias_offset)
>  		return;
>  	nodedata_phys = __pa(node_data[nodeid]);
>  	reserve_early(nodedata_phys, nodedata_phys + pgdat_size, "NODE_DATA");

I'm concerned about this, because it really seems to rely on subtleties
in the behavior of early_node_mem, as well as the direction of
find_e820_area -- which is pretty much intended to change anyway.  It's
the "action at a distance" effect.

What we really want, I think, is to push the offsetting into
find_early_area().  Right now we have an alignment parameter, but what
we need is an alignment and a color parameter (this is just a classic
case of cache coloring, after all) which indicates the desirable offset
from the alignment base.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/