[PATCH] x86: avoid using vmalloc_to_page on non-vmalloc'ed addresses

From: Mark Asselstine
Date: Thu Aug 19 2010 - 15:30:36 EST


It is possible that addresses passed to text_poke() fall beyond _etext
but are also not vmalloc'ed and thus should be using virt_to_page() and
not vmalloc_to_page(). Using is_vmalloc_addr() ensures the proper logic
is used to retrieve the page.

Signed-off-by: Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
At the moment I don't believe there are any situations where this is a
problem in Linus' tree but I know that mixing LTTng and RT with things
can cause this to be troublesome. LTTng introduces an immediate value
optimization which makes use of text_poke and this can happen beyond
_etext. The example I was looking at is in rd_load_image which results
in

rd_load_image --> kmalloc --> trace_kmalloc --> imv_read

The imv_read will insert a 'mov $0x0,%al' in rd_load_image which will
later be the site of the text_poke when arch_imv_update is called.
Looking at the addresses of my build _etext = c1490b2c,
rd_load_image = c1671034 and VMALLOC_START = d87fd000. So in this case
I believe, and this is where I suspect I will get some feedback, it
is *not* acceptable to be doing a vmalloc_to_page() operation on the
address which was not vmalloc'ed.

arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index f65ab8b..0c8c26c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ void *__kprobes text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
struct page *pages[2];
int i;

- if (!core_kernel_text((unsigned long)addr)) {
+ if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr)) {
pages[0] = vmalloc_to_page(addr);
pages[1] = vmalloc_to_page(addr + PAGE_SIZE);
} else {
--
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/