Re: kernel-doc problem

[Randy Dunlap]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:20:19 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:

> Randy, all,
> 
> I'm running into a problem where something that I want to be part of a
> description of a struct member or function parameter gets parsed as a
> new section. You can easily see the problem by running below test file
> through kernel-doc, clearly the intent is not to have a new section in
> the middle of function argument descriptions, but I have no idea how I
> could fix this.
> 
> I'd appreciate if you could take a look.
> 
> Thanks,
> Johannes
> 
> --- here's the file ---
> /**
>  * fn - test
>  *
>  * @a: This is just a non-sense and totally useless dummy function
>  *	argument: it has absolutely no effect.
>  */
> void fn(int a)
> {
> }

Colons (':') are bad.  They cause a section instance.
I don't know how to fix it (inside kernel-doc or docproc or xmlto or wherever).
Sometimes I change colon to "--" or "." or something that makes some sense,
but colon is still the better choice if it would work.

The word "example" has a similar problem.  It causes an <informalexample>
markup to begin, but it's not always terminated properly.
See recent commit 3d2be54bab7efd97b642838b9c883869ca5b98be.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/