Re: [PATCH] fs.h: introduce functions to get/set file->private_data

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:26:13AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 04:54 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:03:55PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> > > And spatch could also be used to rename private_data to f_private_data
> > > if people really cared....
> > Agreed, that's much better than adding useless accessors.
> 
> Against Linus' current, it's ~850KB.
> Anyone really want it?

This clearly shows how big the effort would be to
introduce access functions.
And if the only gain is grepability then such a
cleanup patch is far more convinient.

It takes minimum effort to create and test, and if you can
get ack from Ted and/or Christoph there is a good chance Linus
would take it right before/after -rc1.

You obviously need to convince him that the patch has
seen decent build testing.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/